Compare/Contrast of Political Parties Essay

Autonomous PARTY 1) Values and Beliefs - Protect the privilege to life of the honest unborn; - Stop the undeclared wars which are day by day costing American lives and billions of expense dollars; - Stop wild spending, including remote guide, and deal with America’s local needs - End obligation financing of both Federal and State governments; - End the Federal annual duty, and reestablish a levy based income framework; - Immediately end worldwide exchange understandings, for example, NAFTA, WTO, and the proposed FTAA, and quit sending lucrative American employments to remote nations; - Reduce migration, and stop all administration sponsorships to displaced people; no driver’s licenses for illegals; oust every foreigner; - Defend America’s virtues; keep God in the vow of devotion; - Support elevated expectations in instruction, including consolation of tuition based schools and self-teaching; - Stop the looting of purchasers and citizens by the vitality/utility imposing business models; - Defend Second Amendment rights; - Restore an obligation free, premium free cash framework; - Uphold conventional marriage and family esteems; 2)History of the Independents - California’s American Independent Party hosts been a polling form qualified political gathering since 1968. The American Independent Party, which presently has nearly 300,000 enrolled individuals in California, is subsidiary at the national level with the Constitution Party. - On July 8, 1967, formal association of California’s American Independent Party was finished at a show held in Bakersfield. â€Å"A new gathering is earnestly required today in light of the fact that the pioneers of the two existing gatherings, Democrat and Republican, have abandoned the standards and conventions of our nation’s establishing fathers. Control of the legislature, under the mastery of these two existing gatherings, has left the hands of the individuals our administration was made to serve.† - In 1967, Gov. George C. Wallace of Alabama was on the transition to run for President on another gathering ticket. Wallace supporters welcomed with excitement the arrangement of the American Independent Party. - On August 3, 1968, the agents to the state show of the American Independent Party received the party’s first stage. This report held gigantic hugeness for An I P activists who hosted combined the new get in light of the fact that they needed significant changes in open approaches. 3)Why Independent? - The American Independent Party has kept alive the best of the American standards which have to a great extent been surrender by the Democrat and Republican parties.The American Independent Party has made due for over a fourth of a century on the grounds that the gathering has had successful pioneers, alongside a well known stage, underscoring regard forever, monetary duty, a decreased job of government in people’s lives, decrease of the taxation rate, control of wrongdoing, insurance of American organizations, laborers, and ranchers fromâ unfair remote rivalry, and an America first non-interventionist international strategy. 4)Young Independents Today - Some host recommended that the American Independent Get-together might be conflicted in relation to youthful Americans whose perspectives are claimed to be fundamentally not quite the same as those of moderately aged and more established Americans. The responsibility of Young Americans to the country’s customary good, political, and monetary qualities, in any case, stays equivalent to that of other age gatherings. - The eventual fate of the American Independent Party is guaranteed by a business opportunity for its perspectives among youthful Americans who don't have long periods of responsibility to the predominant gatherings. Today, the political atmosphere in America is evolving. The individuals are searching for new voices, new decisions, new vehicles for political articulation. The individuals are seeking the American Independent Party for administration. POPULIST PARTY 1)History - delegates received the foundation of the People’s party additionally called the Populist party - the populists spoke to a terrific alliance of ranchers, workers, and reformers, which expected to return government to the hands of the individuals - populist pioneers were assorted and brilliant - the populists picked their competitors in the midst of calls for confined movement and a shorter workday for mechanical workers. - the gathering likewise intended to persuade the administration to permit the free coinage of silver, a measure that would make silver, not simply gold, legitimate delicate. - notwithstanding activity by the ranchers coalitions and the grangers the situation of thousands of ranchers compounded. - the foundation of the populist party called for broad changes - reformers accepted that ranchers and laborers ought to be liberated from the exploitative acts of banks and railways and shippers - the populists increased 14 seats in congress, won 2 governorships, and got the biggest number of well known votes cast for any outsider during the 1800s - when of the 1896 political decision the populist party itself had declined yet a portion of its thoughts entered the standard - the proceeding with wretchedness constrained the vote based gathering into a progressively extreme situation on one key issue-boundless coinage of silver - this position drove numerous populists to help the law based up-and-comer william jennings bryan of nebraska - populism started to decay - one factor restricted populism’s quality in the south - people groups party neglected to increase wide help in the south - the southern partnership exhorted its memebers to help significant gathering competitors who supported horticultural interests - the fundamental explanation behind the disappointment of populism in the south was the issue of racial oppression - the southern union expected that populism may prompt additions for african americans

Enjoyment and stimulation Essay Example For Students

Satisfaction and incitement Essay 2.3.5 Enjoyment and thrill Thrill is characterized as high level of satisfaction and incitement that has the positive enthusiastic territory ( Russell, 1980 ) . Invigoration can other than be related as to satisfy retail results ( Dawson, 1990 ) . Fitting to Lotz, Eastlick and Shim ( 1999 ) , the feeling that has been considered as the cardinal experience that pulls in customer to a shopping promenade is fervor. Jeong, Fiore, Niehm and Lorenz ( 2009, p.109 ) refered to from ( Eroglu, Machleit and Davis, 2003 ; Mano and Oliver, 1993 ) that passionate pleasance is characterized as the evaluation of felicity and loveliness and energizing as the evaluation of incitement, thrill, and readiness ; subsequently, measurements of enthusiastic pleasance and awakening may intervene buyer encounters and site backing reason. Essentially, as the site s shopping is all the more satisfying, purchasers are bound to purchase a product ( Monsuwe, Delleart and Ruyter, 2004 ) . Buyer other than partner shopping with delight and elation which they would accept is a joy action to them independent in an on the web or disconnected setting. Delight is characterized as the degree to which internet shopping is seen to be specifically satisfying and joy ( Chiu, Chang, Cheng and Fang, 2009, p.767 ) . Customers today will in general be more relaxation driven contrasted with the customers in the mid 1990 s ( Nicholls, Li, Kranendonk and Roslow, 2002 ) . For certain buyers, looking for dresss is fun, relax, extricate uping, pleasance or relaxation. In disconnected shopping, customers may tie in happiness and invigoration in the shopping promenade condition with their companions or family. Blending to the examination of Dennis ( 2002 ) , he recommends that disconnected shopping will be more satisfying than on-line shopping as respected by the customers. Tracker, ( 2006 ) recommended that retail shippers should build the level of positive feelings in their shopping prome nade by making an energizing and cheerful experience. The exploration of Millan and Howard ( 2007 ) came about that Magyar customers visited malls for both valuable and experiential grounds ; some saw shopping as a recreation action joined by individual and delighted in looking about while convey throughing their shopping undertaking. Rajamma, Paswan and Ganesh ( 2007 ) recommended that there is a higher significance to the happiness aspect of looking for customers who like to shop in disconnected shops contrasted with those buyers who feel comfortable purchasing from the internet. Otieno, Harrow and Lea-Greenwood ( 2005 ) expressed that grown-up females delighted in shopping due to the way, inclinations, joy, for peruse, felt specific, looked great on the dresss, professed to be â€Å"shopaholic† , retail treatment, cover different employments, love for clothes, and so on. While in internet shopping, buyers is relied upon to connect delight and invigoration with the experience ingested in the purchasing methodology and the fervor degree is required to start during the product bringing system. Fitting to Broekhuizen and Huizingh ( 2009 ) , on-line shopping causes happiness which is cheerfulness and fun loving rather than from shopping undertaking finishing ; customers may see the acquisition of products in on-line shopping as an encounter and the detected diversion will be viewed as delight to them. Purchasers will in general shop more, indict in increasingly impromptu purchasing and search out all the more invigorating stocks when they feel charming and excited in the shopping condition ( Monsuwe, Delleart and Ruyter, 2004 ) . Buyer s reason to return should increment as the degree a customer partner elation with an e-posterior expansion ; as the mental expense decreases, the on-line shopping experience will be all the more satisfying and consequently makes thrill ( Jayawardhena and Wright, 2009 ) . Customers will hold increasingly inspirational mentality when they appreciate the experience of internet shopping and are bound to follow the internet as a shopping medium ; intensity of beguilement of web based shopping will reflect buyers happiness ( Monsuwe, Delleart and Ruyter, 2004 ) . From the exploration of Jayawardhena and Wright ( 2009 ) , it came about that the examination of the e-following condition drives the customers to loll the shopping encounters ; they other than f ound that positive expression of oral depression will be made when it is impacted by the thrill emphatically. .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f , .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f .postImageUrl , .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f .focused content territory { min-tallness: 80px; position: relative; } .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f , .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f:hover , .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f:visited , .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f:active { border:0!important; } .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f .clearfix:after { content: ; show: table; clear: both; } .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f { show: square; progress: foundation shading 250ms; webkit-change: foundation shading 250ms; width: 100%; darkness: 1; progress: haziness 250ms; webkit-progress: murkiness 250ms; foundation shading: #95A5A6; } .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f:active , .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f:hover { mistiness: 1; change: obscurity 250ms; webkit-change: obscurity 250ms; foundation shading: #2C3E50; } .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f .focused content region { width: 100%; position: rel ative; } .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f .ctaText { outskirt base: 0 strong #fff; shading: #2980B9; text dimension: 16px; textual style weight: intense; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; content improvement: underline; } .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f .postTitle { shading: #FFFFFF; text dimension: 16px; textual style weight: 600; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; width: 100%; } .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f .ctaButton { foundation shading: #7F8C8D!important; shading: #2980B9; fringe: none; outskirt sweep: 3px; box-shadow: none; text dimension: 14px; textual style weight: striking; line-stature: 26px; moz-outskirt range: 3px; content adjust: focus; content beautification: none; content shadow: none; width: 80px; min-tallness: 80px; foundation: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/modules/intelly-related-posts/resources/pictures/straightforward arrow.png)no-rehash; position: total; right: 0; top: 0; } .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f:hover .ctaButton { foundation shading: #34495E!importa nt; } .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f .focused content { show: table; tallness: 80px; cushioning left: 18px; top: 0; } .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f-content { show: table-cell; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; cushioning right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-adjust: center; width: 100%; } .u1dcb71aced13169a7fb13d4749a9837f:after { content: ; show: square; clear: both; } READ: Hera EssayRegardless of on the web or disconnected shopping, retail dealers should set in more endeavor to improve condition with the goal that customers can shop in positive feelings and relax the shopping methodology. The review of Liu, He, Gao, and Xie ( 2008 ) expressed that the page desigh, format and shading lucifer will pass on the primary inclination to the visitants ; along these lines e-rears should design comfortable and enchanting pages to pull customers and lengthen their remain so it will expand the chance of procurement.

Whats my age again

What’s my age again The start of the semester was comically reminiscent of the first day of third grade, when after a few minutes of reading from a picture book on the floor I realized I was in the wrong classroom, and the right classroom had a preliminary spelling test. The first biochemistry recitation had a suspiciously young, suspiciously energetic recitation instructor, suspiciously asking the class to introduce itself and not talking about protein structure. Two course 18 freshmen later my heart sank. I couldn’t possibly hope that biochemistry was that trendy now. The class turned to me. “Hi, I’m Lydia. I’m a sophomore. I’m in courses 6-7 and 18. I’m not in 7.05 recitation, am I?” I found out later that we didn’t have recitation that week, which I didn’t realize because I accidentally pre-registered for 7.06 instead of 7.05. Oops. I retreated with my freshly free hour and a bagel, orange juice, and large coffee from Café Four to my favorite empty classroom on campus, a small room in Building Four within hearing distance of the piano practice rooms, with big desks and a huge window looking out over Killian Court, to read The Machine Stops by E.M. Forster, an apocalyptic sci-fi that seemed way too awesome to be homework but, amazingly, was. By the end of the story I had inched halfway around the table to escape the sun, and considered that I should probably spend more time outside and less time creeping away from natural light. Random Hall turned 11 last Wednesday, on Leap Day. I’m turning 20 in less than two weeks, which terrifies me because my last eight purchases have been Legos, mechanical pencils, and glitter fairy stickers to put on my problem sets. I’m trying to figure out if I can be a grownup and still like comic books. Life feels a little like this right now (mouse over): I’m trying to take on an easier but busy schedule this term, to raise my GPA and self-confidence, start a good pattern of sleeping and exercising and eating vegetables, and set the stage for a positive next two years at MIT. 18.06: Linear Algebra Since I decided to be a math major I need to take this. Why not now? I like it so far. It feels like itll be very useful, whatever I end up doing with my life. 18.03: Differential Equations I no-recorded differential equations spring semester freshman year. I’m impressed by how much my ability to work through both familiar and novel problems has improved over the past year at MIT. This class used to be hard; this time around it isn’t (fingers crossed). I like my recitation instructor. He started the first recitation with a pep talk about responsibility and motivation. We should own our decision to take differential equations, he said, and own the material so we can use it to reach our greater goals. I wish someone had given me this pep talk a year ago, but I’m just as happy to hear it now. 6.006: Introduction to Algorithms How to write good code, and then make it even better. About a tenth of Random Hall is currently taking or TA-ing 6.006. I love it. I learned more about programming from the first problem set than I ever expected to learn in two weeks. This class is a prerequisite for almost everything else I want to take. Hopefully it’s the first step to becoming a better programmer, so I can someday write efficient algorithms for genome analysis and help advance our understanding of who we are today and how we got here. 21L.448J, also known as 21W.739J: Darwin and Design We read, think, talk, and write about evolution, religion, our relationship with machines, and the future of human (and/or robot) civilization. I love it. I can’t believe I’m getting credit for this. 7.05: General Biochemistry I like the material so far. My parents both do research in biochemistry and molecular biology; it’s exciting to understand more about what they do every day. I’m happy that the problem sets are not graded, and that the grade breakpoints are set before the first exam. However, this is without a doubt my hardest class this term. The exams are open note. I’m terrified. I also picked up two new jobs: in addition to my UROP and blogging I am now also a professional note taker and button pusher. I am a desk worker, which means I do problem sets on the first floor of my dorm, unlock the door for friends, and panic when facilities workers stop by (“Hi, I’m here about the leak.” “The water leak?” “The heat leak.” “The hot water leak?” “The heat leak.”) or the mail comes in. I am also a note taker in biochemistry, which is exactly what it sounds like. And here we are. I’m starting the term off with five awesome classes, four hobby-jobs of varying intensity, and my first great expedition into existence as a two-decade-old. (And no spelling tests.)

Why Is Not Student Loan Forgiveness - 1161 Words

Student loan forgiveness remains such a vital topic to many individuals because the exorbitant costs of post-secondary education require a majority of students to take on debt in order to simply improve themselves and advance intellectually. Thousands of students are graduating college every year, each with several thousands of dollars in debt. This area is important to research because it will provide insight into the futures of all college students immersed in the deep debt that appears to consistently accompany a quality education. Finances are important to many college students, especially when it is hard to receive scholarships to cover schooling expenses. When going through college, students stress about the amount of debt that they acquire throughout their post-secondary schooling and learning about the potential to have these debts forgiven is monumental. In order to be able to afford the future, it is important to understand the amount of loan debt and the possibility for debt forgiveness to be able to proceed through life. This essay seeks to address the question of whether or not student loan forgiveness is currently adequate for assisting graduates in need of financial assistance. The subject of student loan forgiveness tends to warrant strong opinions from many about whether or not they should occur. In many circumstances, student loans should be forgiven, or at least partially forgiven, and the process to do so should be heavily revised in order to make thisShow MoreRelatedStudent Debt Is Tough And Federal Loan865 Words   |  4 PagesThe qualifications for the program are tough and federal loan forgiveness only applies to federal Direct Loans, not private student loans. If the graduate is lucky enough to land a public service job the graduate must realize that there is no guarantee that the employment will still be around in t en years since no one truly knows how the program will work or if it will work at all. Val Meyers, associate director for the Office of Financial Aid at Michigan State University comments are recorded inRead MoreIs Forgiving Student Loan Debt A Good Idea?972 Words   |  4 PagesAnalysis of Is Forgiving Student Loan Debt a Good Idea Many people would love to have their student loans debt forgive but do not believe it will happen. So Kayla Webley decided to write an article about student loan forgiveness, at the time Webley wrote the article she was the education correspondent for Time magazine. Now she is currently a staff writer for the same magazine. In her article, she claims that the student loan dilemma that is facing a lot of Americans is a problem for your countryRead MoreForgiving Student Loan Debt Essay examples822 Words   |  4 Pagesamount of student loan debt have an effect on the economy? If so would forgiving student loan debt help lower the national debt or would it just increase it? According to Mary Claire Fischer, a writer for Kiplinger’s Personal Finance magazine, â€Å"two-thirds of students who receive bachelor’s degrees leave college with debt in tow† (Fischer). Among these students, the average amount owed is twenty-six thousand dollars (Fischer). There is a six month grace period after graduation to allow the student timeRead MoreEssay on Student Loan Debt Should be Forgiven1256 Words   |  6 PagesDoes the amount of student loan debt have an effect on the economy? If so would forgiving student loan debt help lower the national debt or would it just increase it? According to Mary Claire Fischer, a writer for Kiplinger’s Personal Finance magazine, â€Å"two-thirds of students who receive bachelor’s degrees leave college with an average debt of twenty-six thousand dollars† (Fischer). This means that the average student debt has doubled since 2007 (Ross 24). The total student loan debt is $1.2 trillionRead MoreTypes Of Financial Aid : Grants, Loans, And Work Study Jobs Essay986 Words   |  4 PagesThree types of financial aid are grants, loans, and work-study jobs. Grants are often called â€Å"gift aid† because they are free money—financial aid that doesn’t have to be repaid. Grants are often ne ed-based, while scholarships are usually merit-based.Grants and scholarships can come from the federal government, your state government, your college or career school, or a private or nonprofit organization. Do your research, apply for any grants or scholarships you might be eligible for, and be sure toRead MoreEssay On Student Loans768 Words   |  4 PagesEducation in recent times has embraced a new system regarding student loans, bringing on board a customer-friendly policy. According to this new scheme, students will now have access to loans with easier and less complex repayment terms. This development will help them fast-track the repayment of their debts without hassles. The Department of Education also integrated an income-based repayment plan: a flexible approach geared at facilitating student finance in their most dire hour of need. Sadly, despiteRead MoreStudent Loan Loans Should Not Be Forgiven938 Words   |  4 Pages Should student loan borrowers be forgiven for their debt? The cumulative total of student loan borrowing has already reached $1 trillion dollars already make up more than half of what Barack Obama is pushing to cap the amount any borrower must pay back and forgive outstanding debt after 20 years, even so calling to forgive some or all of the debt that is escalating. Robert Applebaum, the Author behind the Student Loan Forgiveness Act, believes that student loan should be forgiven to highlight anRead MoreStudent Loan Is The Most Powerful Weapon1302 Words   |  6 Pagespowerful, conventional weapons break down, fail, and can be taken while knowledge cannot be. Sadly student loan debts are increasing at an alarming rate. The days of working all summer or part-time throughout the school year in order to pay tuition are long gone and private student loans are the only viable answer for many students aspiring for a professional career. I believe that student loan forgiveness is an issue of the utmost importance in regards to making education more accessible and affordableRead MoreStudent Loans : The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly899 Words   |  4 Pages Running Head: STUDENT LOANS: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY. Brown-Gorham 1 Student Loans: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly Da-Mosi Brown-Gorham English 101-23 Western Carolina University Running Head: STUDENT LOANS: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY. Brown-Gorham 2 Most people are aware that federal student loans are a type of financial aid that must be repaid to the federal government, unlike grants or scholarships. Federal student loans are administered by the United States Government by way ofRead MoreStudent Loan Is A Terrible Idea1308 Words   |  6 PagesStudent loan forgiveness is a terrible idea. Sure, in an idealistic world it would be great if the country could forgive all student loan debt and thus bring relief to all students across the nation. Realistic? Not necessarily! Instead of the fairytale notion of student loan forgiveness being the answer to all the problems, America would fair better in taking the initiative in making reforms to the educational loan system that are a bit more realistic. Student loans are a massive predicament in the

Michelangelo Merisi (Caravaggio) Essay - 1707 Words

There are many Renaissance artists who had a large impact on what was then the future of art. Each of these artists had some-what interesting lives. Although many artists of the Renaissance time had interesting lives, Michelangelo Merisi, who was called Caravaggio, had the most interesting and turbulent life. Caravaggio, was born in Milan in during the late summer or early autumn of 1571. His parents, Fermo Merisi, and Lucia Aratori, had been married on January 14 of that same year. He was the first of their four children. For several generations the Mersi family had lived in the small town of Caravaggio. Caravaggio probably adapted the town name as his own when he left for Rome(Friedlaender 34 – 38).†¦show more content†¦The most reliable of his seventeenth century biographers, Giovanni Petro Bellori, alleges that some criminal difficulty forced him to flee the city, yet nothing is said of that in the Milan police records. When Caravaggio completed his apprenticeship in 1588, he was seventeen years old. Reports say that Caravaggio was seen in the town of Milan multiple times between 1589-1592, but the town was too small to provide a bright young artist any support or much interest. So it is likely that he traveled to places like Lombardy and Veneto, even maybe as far as Venice, picking up whatever jobs and commission he could acquire(Friedlaender 57). When his mother died in 1590 Caravaggio was given a large settlement from his parents estate. He used that money to comfortably support him for a year or two. This money could have lasted him longer but he seemed to squander it somewhat quickly. It has been said that he was already a turbulent extravagant man and that is why he went through his inheritance so rapidly(Langdon 28-29). He probably then set off for Rome. No attempt has ever been made to trace his route. His personal possessions could have fit in a nap sack or wallet, but what he possessed in his mind was endless. As an apprentice in Milan he not only learned the basics but also a skill for portraiture and still life(Friedlander 57-58) Caravaggio probably arrived inShow MoreRelatedCaravaggio And Religion Of Michelangelo Merisi Caravaggio1860 Words   |  8 PagesTrevor Ferguson Semester Paper Art App.1020WI Caravaggio and Religion Michelangelo Merisi Caravaggio was an esteemed Italian baroque artist whom, through his art, established various human connections to religion and his art by humanizing the holy scenes that he would depict. Caravaggio was born in 1571 in Milan where he trained as a painter before relocating to Rome. Over the years, Caravaggio had mastered his skills as an artist, using techniques such as tenebrism and chiaroscuro to become oneRead MoreA Controversial Painter of Post-Renaissance, Michelangelo Merisi de Caravaggio540 Words   |  2 PagesMichelangelo Merisi de Caravaggio (1571-1610) is heralded as the last, and the most controversial painter of the Italian post-Renaissance. In an age when the papacy itself was self-indulgent, corrupt and immoral, Caravaggios sexual ambivalence, his propensity for violence and his scorn for the law made him the enfant terrible of the Italian aristocracy. Qualities that only succeeded in furthering Caravaggio’s notoriety and success. Caravaggios endeavors into art began In 1584 when he was apprenticedRead MoreArt Appreciation Unit 4 Ip Essay1084 Words   |  5 Pagesthrough the postmodern era. 1). Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio; 2) Rembrandt van Rijn; and 3) Peter Paul Rubens, these three artists were known for their religious theme in their art work. The naturalism that was visibly demonstrated in each of the artist work with high contrast of lighting that noticeably appeared in these paintings. Each artist was well known and respected for their work. The three artists Works of Art that I have chosen are: Michelangelo Caravaggio: The Calling of St. MatthewRead MoreComparing Art And The Baroque Eras989 Words   |  4 Pageswill be described by the characteristics, styles and the influences of each; Renaissance and Baroque works of art. Famous artist from the Renaissance era were Leonard da Vinci and Michelangelo Buonarroti. Famous artist from the Baroque era were Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn and Michelangelo Merisi o Amerighi da Caravaggio. The Renaissance History The Renaissance era began in Italy, spread to the rest of Europe and lasted from the 14th to the 17th century. It was defined as a period of cultural historyRead MoreCaravaggio Essay1786 Words   |  8 PagesThe Controversial Caravaggio The Italian Renaissance, which occurred between the fourteenth and sixteenth centuries, was a period of dramatic cultural change where tremendous achievements were made in literature, architecture and art. Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, born in Milan, Italy on September 28, 1571, was a Renaissance artist. He is remembered for his revolutionary yet controversial art which was often deeply rooted in religion. Caravaggio painted during the Counter-Reformation whenRead MoreMartha and Mary Magdalene by Caravaggio884 Words   |  4 Pagesto understanding a work of art then just looking at it. In order to understand a piece, you have to understand the Artist, the time period, and the symbols in that painting that may have very different meaning today. Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio better known as simply Caravaggio was an Italian Baroque master painter born in Italy around 1571. After he apprenticed with a painter in Milan, he moved to Rome, where he lived for most of his life. His work influenced painters around Europe. He’s mostRead MoreAnalysis Of The Denial Of St Peter1134 Words   |  5 Pages The Denial of St. Peter Michelangelo Merisi de Caravaggio’s The Denial of St. Peter depicts the accusal of Peter for being a disciple of Jesus. Painted in 1610 on oil on canvas as was the emerging medium of paintings during the Italian Renaissance. It is on display at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in the Caravaggio and Southern Italy room in the European paintings department. Caravaggio’s piece is relatively medium sized and place directly at eye-level. In this painting, he is being accusedRead MoreThe Era Of The Renaissance1693 Words   |  7 PagesItaly can be looked at as the home of the renaissance and consequently the immergence of great art. Artists such as Michelangelo, Botticelli, Da Vinci, and Raphael are some of the greats and are looked at for standards. But what about the artists whose lives are mysteries, and their works that were influenced by the greats? These artists hold just as much importance in the history of art as do the artist’s whose names can be recalled off the top of an average person’s head. During the sixteenth centuryRead MoreA Personal Statement about the Things I Have Learned in This Course1366 Words   |  6 PagesThe issues, ideas, concepts, and facts I learned in this course have stimulated my imagination and ability to think critically. I have been intrigued most by learning about art through history, from Caravaggio to Munch. The topic that confused and bothered me the most was re lated to the American Civil War, which illuminates the dark side of the countrys history. Because of my future ambitions, I believe that our understanding of why Hollywood became the center of the movie industry over other citiesRead MoreGenre Analysis: The Baroque and Rococo Periods Essay1556 Words   |  7 Pagesworks illustrate the evolvement of a certain genre in Western painting from Renaissance through the modern era. This transformation exemplifies how a similar subject matter can be represented in an entirely new and innovative way. Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio painted the genre scene painting entitled The Musicians during the Italian Baroque period in 1595. The painting depicts four boys in Classical costume. The figures are clearly delineated, and the contours are particularly reminiscent

What made peace hard in the Arab-Israeli conflict Free Essays

string(70) " the prospect of peace after nearly 40 years of constant negotiating\." The peace treaty between Israel and Palestine was signed by the two presidents, Yitzhak Rabin (Israeli president) and Yasser Arafat (Palestinian president) in 1993. The peace treaty didn’t last for very long because the two countries as a whole didn’t like the peace treaty because lots of different groups didn’t agree with it. When the Israelis were given land in Palestine by the US, They were outraged. We will write a custom essay sample on What made peace hard in the Arab-Israeli conflict or any similar topic only for you Order Now They had owned it for almost the last 2000 years. The Palestinians didn’t see why they had to give up their land to the Israelis. What made it worse was the fact that the Israelis took over Jerusalem (sacred place to both Israelis and Palestinians) during the war in 1967. The Israeli Jews wanted Jerusalem because that is where the Wailing Wall is (the last standing wall of their ancient mosque). The Palestinian Muslims wanted Jerusalem because they believe that their prophet Mohammed descended to heaven there. The fact that both sides wanted Jerusalem made peace difficult because they wanted a place that is holy to both of them, and were willing to fight for it. During the wars, seven hundred thousand Palestinians were forced out of the country by the Israelis. They had to become refugees and they had really poor living conditions because most of them lived in makeshift huts and tents. Also, they had poor water supply and a lack of food. They were living in poverty, and this made the situation even worse because they all hated the Israelis even more because they had driven them out and made them live like this. This made peace more difficult because the Palestinians have no quality of life and they hate the Israelis even more. When reporters from Britain and America went to the refugees over there to get some news, they found out that their life was awful for them and then Britain and America started feeling sorry for them. The PLO thought because the fact Britain and America were feeling sorry for them, that they should stop using terrorism. The HAMAS however, didn’t stop using terrorism. This made peace more difficult because there was still terrorism and people dying from this. HAMAS are a Palestinian group who do not accept the state of Israel. They are terrorist organisations who use suicide bombings to try to get what they want, which is to destroy Israel and establish an Islamic state of Palestine. They are worse than the PLO ever were. They think terrorism is the answer because if they use terrorism they will be able to scare the Israelis so much they will eventually surrender. HAMAS challenged the PLO and Arafat for support so they would be able to get bombs and weapons. The Israelis didn’t like HAMAS because they were terrorizing their citizens and they were killing lots of people. This made peace more likely because if the Israelis didn’t like what HAMAS were doing, they would try to make peace to make HAMAS stop. Israel is a small country of less than 5 million people but there are still many different views on how the country should be run. The Labour party is one of the two most powerful parties in Israeli politics. They believe that peace is an important for the wellbeing of their country. The other one is the Likud party. The Likud believe that there should be no Palestinian state and if the Palestinians do something to them they will hit back even harder. Likud won every election in Israel since 1977 up to 1992 which is when the Labour party won. This helped make peace possible because the politicians in the labour party were willing to sign a peace treaty with Yasser Arafat of the PLO. Israel however still had their super power, the USA. When USA heard that Russia had collapsed at the end of the cold war, they didn’t support Israel so strongly because there was no Russia to compete with because they were not helping Palestine anymore. When Russia collapsed, the Arab countries had no support. This was because Russia (USSR) and they had no money from them or weapons. Because of this, other countries felt more sympathetic towards them. Because lots of the Arab countries were looking to the US for money and weapons now, the US had more influence over them. This made peace easier because if the US had more influence over them then they could make them make peace. The gulf war was the war between Iraq and the UN when Saddam Hussein tried to take over Kuwait. The USA went over to Kuwait and stopped him from invading. Lots of Arab countries supported the USA when they were trying to stop Saddam Hussein. Then the Arab countries asked USA why they were on Israel’s side because they did the same as Saddam Hussein in taking over land that was not theirs. The Arabs thought this was very hypocritical of them because they weren’t stopping the Israelis from something that Saddam Hussein had done. Bush (USA president) wanted to keep the Saudi Arabia and Egypt on his side so the other countries would be more sympathetic towards the Palestinians. This made the peace treaty more likely because then the Palestinians would be more willing to make peace because this put pressure on the Israelis to make peace. The members of Likud believe that the entire country of Israel should be theirs, and there should be no form of division of it for the Palestinians. They are not willing to make peace and share their land with the Palestinians at all. The Labour party thought that Jerusalem should still belong to the Jews, but they still thought they should give some land back to the Palestinians in return for peace. When Arafat and the PLO heard of this proposition, they accepted this resolution, and they had high hopes at the prospect of peace after nearly 40 years of constant negotiating. You read "What made peace hard in the Arab-Israeli conflict" in category "Papers" The PLO gave up using terrorism and their plan of trying to drive the Israelis into the sea because they now knew it wouldn’t work. This made peace more possible because they were no longer killing people unnecessarily. Another reason why this made peace more possible was because no one would have sat down at a table if Yasser Arafat was there, because he was the leader of the PLO, which was the terrorist group. Another reason why peace was more possible was because reporters went over to where the refugees lived and found out how they had to live. They found they lived in horrible makeshift tents and they had little food and little water. They realised that people had been born and had died as refugees and had no quality of life. The PLO realised that using terrorism wasn’t getting them anywhere and they needed to stop to be able to get peace. Palestinian civilians aged around fourteen in the Israeli streets started to rebel against the Israeli soldiers by throwing stones at the tanks. The soldiers became irritated and started to shoot them. People were outraged on both the Palestinian and the Israeli sides. These were just kids they were shooting and they weren’t doing any harm by throwing stones at the tanks. This made peace more likely because the people on the Palestinian side were angry that the Israeli soldiers were just shooting their children dead, and they wanted it to stop. This would have made them want to sign the peace treaty. People started to feel sorry for the Palestinians and not blame them for the fact that peace was not possible. When the PLO stopped using terrorism, peace was more possible because they were not trying to kill people to try and get what they wanted. However, HAMAS had not stopped using terrorism and were using suicide bombers and promising people would go to paradise if they died for their country and their religion. Arafat (leader of the PLO) was losing popularity to them and people started listening to HAMAS instead of Yasser Arafat. This made peace more likely because Yasser Arafat needed some sort of victory against HAMAS, so he signed the peace treaty. In 1993, when the two countries of Israel and Palestine signed a peace treaty, Clinton was there as the peacemaker. He wanted to be seen like this because it made him look good to everyone else and also may have helped him win a next election because he has done something really good. One of the reasons Yasser Arafat agreed to the peace treaty was because he needed some sort of success against HAMAS. He wanted to have some more popularity again amongst his people so they would listen to him and not HAMAS. Yitzhak Rabin wanted to make peace because his country was facing economic problems and the government was spending far too much on the army and weapons. Also Yitzhak Rabin wanted peace because the Intifada was making Israel look bad because of their occupation and control of Palestinian territories. The first Intifada ended when Israel granted limited autonomy to the Palestine national authority in the 1993 peace agreement. Lots of things were really necessary to change on both sides for peace between Israel and Palestine. There were lots of things each side did that the other hated. Lots of things did change and made peace possible. First of all, one thing that changed was the new winner of the general Israeli elections in 1992. The Labour party won the next election which made Yitzhak Rabin the president. The labour party were in favour of making peace with Palestine, unlike the Likud who had been in power since 1977. The Likud who were against making peace in Israel were not in power any more so they could not stop the peace treaty. Because the labour party was in control, lots of other people in Israel thought that the peace treaty was a good idea. This was a really important thing to happen because if the Labour party had not been elected there was not going to be any chance of Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat signing a peace treaty. Also in Palestine lots of things changed. The PLO stopped terrorism because people found out how the refugees were living, which made peace possible because they weren’t killing loads of the opposite side. This was quite an important reason because if the PLO hadn’t given up terrorism, no one would have sat down at a table with Yasser Arafat and tried to make peace if he was the leader of a terrorist group. Also the fact that HAMAS were becoming more popular in Palestine made Yasser Arafat want to do something good so he would be more popular again, and people would listen to him and not to HAMAS. This was not as much an important reason as the other reasons because Yasser Arafat would have wanted peace anyway, no matter whether HAMAS was going to carry on with terrorism. Also this was not as important because HAMAS didn’t originally sign the peace treaty, so they were not really part of the agreement. They only made peace more difficult after the treaty had been signed. Overall both the Israelis and the Palestinians had something in their society that changed to make the peace treaty work. Some things still didn’t work out though because although the PLO stopped terrorism, HAMAS still used it. Also, even though the labour party won in 1992, the Likud party won the next election. The Likud were not in favour of peace so this did not work out because the Likud spent vast amounts money on the army again. How to cite What made peace hard in the Arab-Israeli conflict, Papers

What made peace hard in the Arab-Israeli conflict Free Essays

string(70) " the prospect of peace after nearly 40 years of constant negotiating\." The peace treaty between Israel and Palestine was signed by the two presidents, Yitzhak Rabin (Israeli president) and Yasser Arafat (Palestinian president) in 1993. The peace treaty didn’t last for very long because the two countries as a whole didn’t like the peace treaty because lots of different groups didn’t agree with it. When the Israelis were given land in Palestine by the US, They were outraged. We will write a custom essay sample on What made peace hard in the Arab-Israeli conflict or any similar topic only for you Order Now They had owned it for almost the last 2000 years. The Palestinians didn’t see why they had to give up their land to the Israelis. What made it worse was the fact that the Israelis took over Jerusalem (sacred place to both Israelis and Palestinians) during the war in 1967. The Israeli Jews wanted Jerusalem because that is where the Wailing Wall is (the last standing wall of their ancient mosque). The Palestinian Muslims wanted Jerusalem because they believe that their prophet Mohammed descended to heaven there. The fact that both sides wanted Jerusalem made peace difficult because they wanted a place that is holy to both of them, and were willing to fight for it. During the wars, seven hundred thousand Palestinians were forced out of the country by the Israelis. They had to become refugees and they had really poor living conditions because most of them lived in makeshift huts and tents. Also, they had poor water supply and a lack of food. They were living in poverty, and this made the situation even worse because they all hated the Israelis even more because they had driven them out and made them live like this. This made peace more difficult because the Palestinians have no quality of life and they hate the Israelis even more. When reporters from Britain and America went to the refugees over there to get some news, they found out that their life was awful for them and then Britain and America started feeling sorry for them. The PLO thought because the fact Britain and America were feeling sorry for them, that they should stop using terrorism. The HAMAS however, didn’t stop using terrorism. This made peace more difficult because there was still terrorism and people dying from this. HAMAS are a Palestinian group who do not accept the state of Israel. They are terrorist organisations who use suicide bombings to try to get what they want, which is to destroy Israel and establish an Islamic state of Palestine. They are worse than the PLO ever were. They think terrorism is the answer because if they use terrorism they will be able to scare the Israelis so much they will eventually surrender. HAMAS challenged the PLO and Arafat for support so they would be able to get bombs and weapons. The Israelis didn’t like HAMAS because they were terrorizing their citizens and they were killing lots of people. This made peace more likely because if the Israelis didn’t like what HAMAS were doing, they would try to make peace to make HAMAS stop. Israel is a small country of less than 5 million people but there are still many different views on how the country should be run. The Labour party is one of the two most powerful parties in Israeli politics. They believe that peace is an important for the wellbeing of their country. The other one is the Likud party. The Likud believe that there should be no Palestinian state and if the Palestinians do something to them they will hit back even harder. Likud won every election in Israel since 1977 up to 1992 which is when the Labour party won. This helped make peace possible because the politicians in the labour party were willing to sign a peace treaty with Yasser Arafat of the PLO. Israel however still had their super power, the USA. When USA heard that Russia had collapsed at the end of the cold war, they didn’t support Israel so strongly because there was no Russia to compete with because they were not helping Palestine anymore. When Russia collapsed, the Arab countries had no support. This was because Russia (USSR) and they had no money from them or weapons. Because of this, other countries felt more sympathetic towards them. Because lots of the Arab countries were looking to the US for money and weapons now, the US had more influence over them. This made peace easier because if the US had more influence over them then they could make them make peace. The gulf war was the war between Iraq and the UN when Saddam Hussein tried to take over Kuwait. The USA went over to Kuwait and stopped him from invading. Lots of Arab countries supported the USA when they were trying to stop Saddam Hussein. Then the Arab countries asked USA why they were on Israel’s side because they did the same as Saddam Hussein in taking over land that was not theirs. The Arabs thought this was very hypocritical of them because they weren’t stopping the Israelis from something that Saddam Hussein had done. Bush (USA president) wanted to keep the Saudi Arabia and Egypt on his side so the other countries would be more sympathetic towards the Palestinians. This made the peace treaty more likely because then the Palestinians would be more willing to make peace because this put pressure on the Israelis to make peace. The members of Likud believe that the entire country of Israel should be theirs, and there should be no form of division of it for the Palestinians. They are not willing to make peace and share their land with the Palestinians at all. The Labour party thought that Jerusalem should still belong to the Jews, but they still thought they should give some land back to the Palestinians in return for peace. When Arafat and the PLO heard of this proposition, they accepted this resolution, and they had high hopes at the prospect of peace after nearly 40 years of constant negotiating. You read "What made peace hard in the Arab-Israeli conflict" in category "Papers" The PLO gave up using terrorism and their plan of trying to drive the Israelis into the sea because they now knew it wouldn’t work. This made peace more possible because they were no longer killing people unnecessarily. Another reason why this made peace more possible was because no one would have sat down at a table if Yasser Arafat was there, because he was the leader of the PLO, which was the terrorist group. Another reason why peace was more possible was because reporters went over to where the refugees lived and found out how they had to live. They found they lived in horrible makeshift tents and they had little food and little water. They realised that people had been born and had died as refugees and had no quality of life. The PLO realised that using terrorism wasn’t getting them anywhere and they needed to stop to be able to get peace. Palestinian civilians aged around fourteen in the Israeli streets started to rebel against the Israeli soldiers by throwing stones at the tanks. The soldiers became irritated and started to shoot them. People were outraged on both the Palestinian and the Israeli sides. These were just kids they were shooting and they weren’t doing any harm by throwing stones at the tanks. This made peace more likely because the people on the Palestinian side were angry that the Israeli soldiers were just shooting their children dead, and they wanted it to stop. This would have made them want to sign the peace treaty. People started to feel sorry for the Palestinians and not blame them for the fact that peace was not possible. When the PLO stopped using terrorism, peace was more possible because they were not trying to kill people to try and get what they wanted. However, HAMAS had not stopped using terrorism and were using suicide bombers and promising people would go to paradise if they died for their country and their religion. Arafat (leader of the PLO) was losing popularity to them and people started listening to HAMAS instead of Yasser Arafat. This made peace more likely because Yasser Arafat needed some sort of victory against HAMAS, so he signed the peace treaty. In 1993, when the two countries of Israel and Palestine signed a peace treaty, Clinton was there as the peacemaker. He wanted to be seen like this because it made him look good to everyone else and also may have helped him win a next election because he has done something really good. One of the reasons Yasser Arafat agreed to the peace treaty was because he needed some sort of success against HAMAS. He wanted to have some more popularity again amongst his people so they would listen to him and not HAMAS. Yitzhak Rabin wanted to make peace because his country was facing economic problems and the government was spending far too much on the army and weapons. Also Yitzhak Rabin wanted peace because the Intifada was making Israel look bad because of their occupation and control of Palestinian territories. The first Intifada ended when Israel granted limited autonomy to the Palestine national authority in the 1993 peace agreement. Lots of things were really necessary to change on both sides for peace between Israel and Palestine. There were lots of things each side did that the other hated. Lots of things did change and made peace possible. First of all, one thing that changed was the new winner of the general Israeli elections in 1992. The Labour party won the next election which made Yitzhak Rabin the president. The labour party were in favour of making peace with Palestine, unlike the Likud who had been in power since 1977. The Likud who were against making peace in Israel were not in power any more so they could not stop the peace treaty. Because the labour party was in control, lots of other people in Israel thought that the peace treaty was a good idea. This was a really important thing to happen because if the Labour party had not been elected there was not going to be any chance of Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat signing a peace treaty. Also in Palestine lots of things changed. The PLO stopped terrorism because people found out how the refugees were living, which made peace possible because they weren’t killing loads of the opposite side. This was quite an important reason because if the PLO hadn’t given up terrorism, no one would have sat down at a table with Yasser Arafat and tried to make peace if he was the leader of a terrorist group. Also the fact that HAMAS were becoming more popular in Palestine made Yasser Arafat want to do something good so he would be more popular again, and people would listen to him and not to HAMAS. This was not as much an important reason as the other reasons because Yasser Arafat would have wanted peace anyway, no matter whether HAMAS was going to carry on with terrorism. Also this was not as important because HAMAS didn’t originally sign the peace treaty, so they were not really part of the agreement. They only made peace more difficult after the treaty had been signed. Overall both the Israelis and the Palestinians had something in their society that changed to make the peace treaty work. Some things still didn’t work out though because although the PLO stopped terrorism, HAMAS still used it. Also, even though the labour party won in 1992, the Likud party won the next election. The Likud were not in favour of peace so this did not work out because the Likud spent vast amounts money on the army again. How to cite What made peace hard in the Arab-Israeli conflict, Papers